833-847-3280
Schedule a Call

I Got My Pen Test Report and There Were No Findings?

Report with A+

You receive your report, and you see no findings. Does that mean we only ran vulnerability scans?

This question comes up frequently. We’ve talked about the differences between a real pen test and a fake one (aka vulnerability scans). But when there are no findings, it might be confusing, and you might feel like you spent a lot of money for nothing.

Network penetration tests focus on the programs that deliver content to clients. Meaning a web server, a file transfer server, or a remote management server, etc. Are these systems vulnerable? Have they been misconfigured? Is there a vulnerability in the current running version because it hasn’t been patched yet? Is the firewall configured properly to not allow traffic to internal systems, etc?

Penetration tests are meant to be proof of your mitigation efforts. The more security-conscious and security-minded you get, the tighter your network or application becomes from a security perspective. When a penetration tester finds an issue, it means you had a hole in your security posture, whether from a recent change in your design or because someone discovered and disclosed a vulnerability in a program you are using and haven’t yet patched it. When a penetration tester doesn’t identify any findings, it can be because you are all patched up, and your firewall and services are properly configured, or you aren’t providing any services.

The external networks are fairly easy to protect, as there is a boundary or a door, and you can put a bouncer (aka firewall) at the door to block people from coming in. A penetration test on external networks will often consist of creating packets of various configurations in an attempt to get passed those firewall rules. If there are no services being provided to the public (like a web server, file server, VPNs, or remote management services), then the likelihood of there being a finding is very slim. That said, a tester still has to spend time and effort performing various types of scans and tests and evaluating the responses to confirm that the firewall is configured properly and doing the job it was designed to do.

A result of no findings means they performed all the possible tests; however, your security posture is such that there were no holes in your mitigation efforts. A test result of no findings does not cheapen the report; instead, it points to proof that you are security conscious and that your methods of mitigation are effective.

Latest Posts

A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
When a major brand like Victoria’s Secret, MGM, or T-Mobile gets hacked, it’s all over the news. These companies are household names, and a breach affecting them often exposes millions of customer records, making it a national, or even global, story. But what about small…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
 Choosing a penetration tester isn’t just about credentials or price; it’s about trust, depth, and the results they deliver. In today’s rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape, selecting the right penetration testing partner is more critical than ever. At MainNerve, we’ve witnessed significant shifts in the…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
Cybersecurity threats in 2025 are evolving faster than most organizations can keep pace with. In early 2025, a global financial institution paid out a staggering $75 million following a ransomware attack. The cause? A single, compromised endpoint tied to a legacy application that had gone…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
   Targeted retesting focuses only on the vulnerabilities you’ve already remediated. It’s scoped tightly around the affected systems, configurations, or application components that were updated, patched, or re-engineered in response to findings from the original penetration test. This approach offers several key benefits: 1.…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
In an era dominated by automation and AI-driven tools, it’s easy to assume that cybersecurity, like many other industries, can be handled entirely by machines. From auto-generated vulnerability scans to AI chatbots that claim to manage risk, automation is everywhere. However, when it comes to…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
 The March 31, 2025, deadline for PCI DSS 4.0 compliance has passed, and organizations now face a new security landscape that demands continuous attention, ongoing validation, and stronger risk-based decision-making. If your organization met the deadline, the work isn’t over. And if you didn’t?…
contact

Our Team

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
On Load
Where? .serviceMM
What? Mega Menu: Services