833-847-3280
Schedule a Call

Penetration Testing vs. Vulnerability Scanning

Penetration Testing

There are many differences between penetration testing and vulnerability scanning or assessments.

Based on NIST SP 800-115, Technical Guide to Information Security Testing and Assessment,

Penetration Testing is

“Security testing in which evaluators mimic real-world attacks in an attempt to identify ways to circumvent the security features of an application, system, or network. Penetration testing often involves issuing real attacks on real systems and data, using the same tools and techniques used by actual attackers. Most penetration tests involve looking for combinations of vulnerabilities on a single system or multiple systems that can be used to gain more access than could be achieved through a single vulnerability.”

This means that an engineer, or tester, is interacting and trying to exploit vulnerabilities. Discovery findings are located on the target systems or web application. It is human driven. The idea is that the engineer or tester will be acting like a “hacker.” NIST calls this Active Security Testing.
 
In addition, NIST 800-115 also states that Passive Security Testing is “Security testing that does not involve any direct interaction with the targets.” This represents vulnerability scans.  
 
An engineer or tester might plug certain information into the software. The rest of the engagement is the software scanning in-scope devices or applications for known vulnerabilities. This is an automated process. Consequently, some software also has a little check box that will allow for some vulnerabilities to be exploited. This method isn’t always accurate and contains limitations.
 
Moreover, software just doesn’t have the human wisdom that experienced testers or engineers have. They are looking for many vulnerabilities that could create a significant hole in your network.
For example, they are looking at things that aren’t based on business logic, such as default credentials.
 

What about vulnerability assessments?

The human element verifies that the vulnerabilities actually exist. Sometimes the scanning software produces a false positive. A tester or engineer verifies each finding to ensure you have a list of vulnerabilities based on current knowledge.
 
In short, each has it’s place but the differences should be clear. If you would like to learn more about these services, contact us today.

Latest Posts

A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
In today’s digital landscape, cyberattacks are relentless, sophisticated, and increasingly costly. Yet, many government regulations designed to protect sensitive data and critical infrastructure fall short, not because they lack good intentions, but because they fail to explicitly require penetration testing as a standard practice. This regulatory ambiguity…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
 Every IT manager knows the drill. You schedule your annual penetration test, the security team arrives, runs their tools, and delivers a comprehensive report detailing vulnerabilities and recommendations. You check the compliance box, file the report, and get back to your daily grind. Fast…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
When a major brand like Victoria’s Secret, MGM, or T-Mobile gets hacked, it’s all over the news. These companies are household names, and a breach affecting them often exposes millions of customer records, making it a national, or even global, story. But what about small…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
 Choosing a penetration tester isn’t just about credentials or price; it’s about trust, depth, and the results they deliver. In today’s rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape, selecting the right penetration testing partner is more critical than ever. At MainNerve, we’ve witnessed significant shifts in the…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
Cybersecurity threats in 2025 are evolving faster than most organizations can keep pace with. In early 2025, a global financial institution paid out a staggering $75 million following a ransomware attack. The cause? A single, compromised endpoint tied to a legacy application that had gone…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
   Targeted retesting focuses only on the vulnerabilities you’ve already remediated. It’s scoped tightly around the affected systems, configurations, or application components that were updated, patched, or re-engineered in response to findings from the original penetration test. This approach offers several key benefits: 1.…
contact

Our Team

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
On Load
Where? .serviceMM
What? Mega Menu: Services