833-847-3280
Schedule a Call

The Essential Step: IP Allow-Listing for Efficient Penetration Testing

People sitting in front of computers

In the critical realm of cybersecurity, efficiency isn’t just valuable—it’s imperative. The phrase “time is money” captures a universal truth, particularly relevant to the realm of penetration testing. As organizations endeavor to navigate the complexities of securing their digital assets, the role of penetration testers becomes increasingly crucial. These cyber defenders simulate attacks on systems to uncover vulnerabilities. However, an important step is often overlooked which prevents these tests from being effective and efficient: Intrusion Prevention System (IPS) allow-listing for penetration testers.

 

The Hurdle of Intrusion Prevention Systems

Intrusion Prevention Systems (IPS) act as essential safeguards for network assets in the digital environment, designed to block unauthorized access and prevent attacks. Although continuous monitoring by an IPS is crucial to security, it can inadvertently become a significant obstacle during penetration testing. This slows down the testing process by blocking the scans necessary for the discovery of assets.

The discovery phase is where the foundation for the entire penetration test is laid. Through port scanning and service identification, testers map out the network, identifying potentially vulnerable points of entry and the services that could be exploited. Any impediment in this phase, such as interference from an IPS, can lead to incomplete results, leaving unseen vulnerabilities and, thus, incomplete protection.

 

Why Time Efficiency is Paramount

Engaging a third-party vendor for penetration testing introduces a scheduled dynamic into the cybersecurity efforts of an organization. These vendors operate under strict timelines, balancing multiple clients and projects. Any delay in commencing or executing these tests, particularly from preventable causes like IPS interference, doesn’t just slow down the discovery of vulnerabilities; it also disrupts the tightly scheduled workflows of these vendors. Malicious actors are not bound by time constraints. They can spend as much or as little time as they choose evaluating an organization’s assets. However, security professionals (ethical hackers) are limited in the time frame they can spend on a customer’s network or application.  This means they must use automated tools to speed up the process where possible. Intrusion Prevention Systems are often configured to detect and block these methods of enumeration because it is an easy way to identify illegitimate traffic.

 

Granting the Same Access as Trusted Third Parties

To conduct thorough and effective penetration testing efficiently, testers need access like that of trusted third parties. This level of access is essential for a comprehensive discovery phase, which involves port scanning and service identification. This will enable penetration testers to confirm the security of assets that might be at risk should a trusted third party experience a breach. Testers can quickly identify all assets, which means they spend less time on discovery and more time assessing them for possible vulnerabilities.

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is evident that time efficiency is crucial when utilizing third-party penetration testing services. It requires a proactive approach to cybersecurity, where organizations take steps to eliminate foreseeable delays. IP allow-listing emerges as a critical action in this context, ensuring that time, resources, and the expertise of third-party vendors are utilized to their fullest potential. By acknowledging and acting on the principle that time delays equate to increased risk and cost, organizations can strengthen their defenses with minimal friction and maximal effectiveness.

Latest Posts

A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
In today’s digital landscape, cyberattacks are relentless, sophisticated, and increasingly costly. Yet, many government regulations designed to protect sensitive data and critical infrastructure fall short, not because they lack good intentions, but because they fail to explicitly require penetration testing as a standard practice. This regulatory ambiguity…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
 Every IT manager knows the drill. You schedule your annual penetration test, the security team arrives, runs their tools, and delivers a comprehensive report detailing vulnerabilities and recommendations. You check the compliance box, file the report, and get back to your daily grind. Fast…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
When a major brand like Victoria’s Secret, MGM, or T-Mobile gets hacked, it’s all over the news. These companies are household names, and a breach affecting them often exposes millions of customer records, making it a national, or even global, story. But what about small…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
 Choosing a penetration tester isn’t just about credentials or price; it’s about trust, depth, and the results they deliver. In today’s rapidly evolving cybersecurity landscape, selecting the right penetration testing partner is more critical than ever. At MainNerve, we’ve witnessed significant shifts in the…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
Cybersecurity threats in 2025 are evolving faster than most organizations can keep pace with. In early 2025, a global financial institution paid out a staggering $75 million following a ransomware attack. The cause? A single, compromised endpoint tied to a legacy application that had gone…
A transparent image used for creating empty spaces in columns
   Targeted retesting focuses only on the vulnerabilities you’ve already remediated. It’s scoped tightly around the affected systems, configurations, or application components that were updated, patched, or re-engineered in response to findings from the original penetration test. This approach offers several key benefits: 1.…
contact

Our Team

Name(Required)
This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
On Load
Where? .serviceMM
What? Mega Menu: Services